A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.
Identifieur interne : 003729 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003728; suivant : 003730A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.
Auteurs : Elizabeth Ramlal [Canada] ; Denys Yemshanov ; Glenn Fox ; Daniel MckenneySource :
- Journal of environmental management [ 1095-8630 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH), Arbres (MeSH), Biomasse (MeSH), Canada (MeSH), Carbone (MeSH), Dépollution biologique de l'environnement (MeSH), Eaux d'égout (MeSH), Modèles théoriques (MeSH), Modèles économiques (MeSH), Populus (MeSH), Élimination des déchets (méthodes), Élimination des déchets (économie).
- MESH :
- Wicri :
- geographic : Canada.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Carbon, Sewage.
- geographic : Canada.
- economics : Refuse Disposal.
- methods : Refuse Disposal.
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Biomass, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Models, Economic, Models, Theoretical, Populus, Trees.
Abstract
This study explores the economic attractiveness of afforestation as a strategy for the joint production of fibre, carbon storage and biosolids (treated municipal sewage sludge) disposal for municipalities in Southern and Central Ontario, Canada. We use a spatial, stochastic model, the Canadian Forest Service Afforestation Feasibility Model (CFS-AFM), to simulate a range of spatial biosolids application scenarios in hybrid poplar afforestation projects. Results suggest that such joint afforestation strategies could be financially attractive. Significant cost savings can be expected through decreases in transportation distances and avoided waste disposal fees. Sensitivity analysis is used to examine the effects of variations in critical model parameters on net present values. Our findings indicate that waste disposal savings from application of biosolids on hybrid poplar plantations combined with incentives for landowners to sequester carbon can easily compete with agricultural land rental values in some regions of Ontario. Social acceptance of this kind of activity, however, may be an impediment to adoption.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.029
PubMed: 19185971
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.</title><author><name sortKey="Ramlal, Elizabeth" sort="Ramlal, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Ramlal E" first="Elizabeth" last="Ramlal">Elizabeth Ramlal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. eramlal@uoguelph.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>ON</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yemshanov, Denys" sort="Yemshanov, Denys" uniqKey="Yemshanov D" first="Denys" last="Yemshanov">Denys Yemshanov</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fox, Glenn" sort="Fox, Glenn" uniqKey="Fox G" first="Glenn" last="Fox">Glenn Fox</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mckenney, Daniel" sort="Mckenney, Daniel" uniqKey="Mckenney D" first="Daniel" last="Mckenney">Daniel Mckenney</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19185971</idno><idno type="pmid">19185971</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.029</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003667</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003667</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003667</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003667</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003667</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.</title><author><name sortKey="Ramlal, Elizabeth" sort="Ramlal, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Ramlal E" first="Elizabeth" last="Ramlal">Elizabeth Ramlal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. eramlal@uoguelph.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>ON</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yemshanov, Denys" sort="Yemshanov, Denys" uniqKey="Yemshanov D" first="Denys" last="Yemshanov">Denys Yemshanov</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fox, Glenn" sort="Fox, Glenn" uniqKey="Fox G" first="Glenn" last="Fox">Glenn Fox</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mckenney, Daniel" sort="Mckenney, Daniel" uniqKey="Mckenney D" first="Daniel" last="Mckenney">Daniel Mckenney</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of environmental management</title><idno type="eISSN">1095-8630</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodegradation, Environmental (MeSH)</term><term>Biomass (MeSH)</term><term>Canada (MeSH)</term><term>Carbon (MeSH)</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Models, Economic (MeSH)</term><term>Models, Theoretical (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (MeSH)</term><term>Refuse Disposal (economics)</term><term>Refuse Disposal (methods)</term><term>Sewage (MeSH)</term><term>Trees (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH)</term><term>Arbres (MeSH)</term><term>Biomasse (MeSH)</term><term>Canada (MeSH)</term><term>Carbone (MeSH)</term><term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement (MeSH)</term><term>Eaux d'égout (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles théoriques (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles économiques (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (MeSH)</term><term>Élimination des déchets (méthodes)</term><term>Élimination des déchets (économie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon</term><term>Sewage</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Refuse Disposal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Refuse Disposal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Élimination des déchets</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Élimination des déchets</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodegradation, Environmental</term><term>Biomass</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Models, Economic</term><term>Models, Theoretical</term><term>Populus</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term><term>Arbres</term><term>Biomasse</term><term>Canada</term><term>Carbone</term><term>Dépollution biologique de l'environnement</term><term>Eaux d'égout</term><term>Modèles théoriques</term><term>Modèles économiques</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Canada</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study explores the economic attractiveness of afforestation as a strategy for the joint production of fibre, carbon storage and biosolids (treated municipal sewage sludge) disposal for municipalities in Southern and Central Ontario, Canada. We use a spatial, stochastic model, the Canadian Forest Service Afforestation Feasibility Model (CFS-AFM), to simulate a range of spatial biosolids application scenarios in hybrid poplar afforestation projects. Results suggest that such joint afforestation strategies could be financially attractive. Significant cost savings can be expected through decreases in transportation distances and avoided waste disposal fees. Sensitivity analysis is used to examine the effects of variations in critical model parameters on net present values. Our findings indicate that waste disposal savings from application of biosolids on hybrid poplar plantations combined with incentives for landowners to sequester carbon can easily compete with agricultural land rental values in some regions of Ontario. Social acceptance of this kind of activity, however, may be an impediment to adoption.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19185971</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2009</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>09</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1095-8630</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>90</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of environmental management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Environ Manage</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1833-43</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.029</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This study explores the economic attractiveness of afforestation as a strategy for the joint production of fibre, carbon storage and biosolids (treated municipal sewage sludge) disposal for municipalities in Southern and Central Ontario, Canada. We use a spatial, stochastic model, the Canadian Forest Service Afforestation Feasibility Model (CFS-AFM), to simulate a range of spatial biosolids application scenarios in hybrid poplar afforestation projects. Results suggest that such joint afforestation strategies could be financially attractive. Significant cost savings can be expected through decreases in transportation distances and avoided waste disposal fees. Sensitivity analysis is used to examine the effects of variations in critical model parameters on net present values. Our findings indicate that waste disposal savings from application of biosolids on hybrid poplar plantations combined with incentives for landowners to sequester carbon can easily compete with agricultural land rental values in some regions of Ontario. Social acceptance of this kind of activity, however, may be an impediment to adoption.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ramlal</LastName><ForeName>Elizabeth</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. eramlal@uoguelph.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yemshanov</LastName><ForeName>Denys</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fox</LastName><ForeName>Glenn</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>McKenney</LastName><ForeName>Daniel</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>30</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Environ Manage</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0401664</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0301-4797</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012722">Sewage</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>7440-44-0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002244">Carbon</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001673" MajorTopicYN="Y">Biodegradation, Environmental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018533" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomass</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002170" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Canada</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002244" MajorTopicYN="N">Carbon</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018803" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Economic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008962" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Theoretical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012037" MajorTopicYN="N">Refuse Disposal</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012722" MajorTopicYN="Y">Sewage</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="Y">Trees</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2008</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2008</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19185971</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0301-4797(08)00346-0</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.029</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Fox, Glenn" sort="Fox, Glenn" uniqKey="Fox G" first="Glenn" last="Fox">Glenn Fox</name><name sortKey="Mckenney, Daniel" sort="Mckenney, Daniel" uniqKey="Mckenney D" first="Daniel" last="Mckenney">Daniel Mckenney</name><name sortKey="Yemshanov, Denys" sort="Yemshanov, Denys" uniqKey="Yemshanov D" first="Denys" last="Yemshanov">Denys Yemshanov</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ramlal, Elizabeth" sort="Ramlal, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Ramlal E" first="Elizabeth" last="Ramlal">Elizabeth Ramlal</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003729 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003729 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19185971
|texte= A bioeconomic model of afforestation in Southern Ontario: integration of fiber, carbon and municipal biosolids values.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19185971" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |